You did say that Jesus was God thus Mary is the mother of God. You don’t allow for any human nature in that at all.
“You did say that Jesus was God thus Mary is the mother of God. You don’t allow for any human nature in that at all.”
Your conclusion is completely false. The fact that Jesus IS God does not preclude His possession of human nature. You have given out this completely erroneous conclusion now at least twice and yet I have never once said anything that could possible lead any rational person to that conclusion. In my conversation with you on this topic I have said:
#1442: “Jesus was fully human (except for sin). Why would you ever suggest that the incarnation of Jesus was a fraud?”
#1342: “And Jesus is ONE in Himself even though He has two natures (divine and human).”
So, with those COMPLETELY UNAMBIGUOUS STATEMENTS that Christ is a man - “Jesus was fully human,” and “human” how can you possibly conclude, “You don’t allow for any human nature in that at all.”
“To Protestantism False Witness is the principle of propagation.” (John Henry Newman, Lecture 4. True Testimony Insufficient for the Protestant View)