That’s a possibility, but you would think as much as that time period was orally and written by multiple people and historians that fact would at least be hinted at or referenced in some form or fashion...
I think I will stick with ocams razor...
James and Joses are identified elsewhere in the Scriptures as the sons of a man named "Alphaeus". The Gospels call James and Judas (not the Iscariot) Jesus' "brothers" in one place, but in another, it's clear that Judas is actually James' son. None of Jesus' "brothers and sisters" are ever identified as sons or daughters of Mary.
Would that be Norelco, or Gillette?
There really is not much written early (first century) Church history outside the New Testament. There is a work by F.F. Bruce that does discuss extra biblical historical documents , “Jesus and Christian Origins Outside the New Testament” (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1974). A good book.
For other early writings consider the Patristic Fathers, Clement,Justin Martyr, Eusebius, etc.
I would note that there were a number of protestant reformers like Luther, Calvin, and Wesley who considered Mary to be Perpetual Virgin. But that issue looks back to this divisive looking thread....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/934893/posts
(NYer writes; “Pinging the troops ... both camps! I’ll put on the first pot of coffee.”)