Replies

Strawman? IDK.

"Historic Protestantism" was the exact phrase used upthread in post #10.

I'm attempting to discover when this reliance on tradition became an accepted part of Protestant theology. What's "straw" about that?

Anything to offer?

All I know is that Warren doesn't measure up to its standards, apparently.

As you may be aware, I don't have a problem with authentic Christian tradition but I find it strange that Protestants would lapse into this heretical Catholic practice.

As you may be aware, I don't have a problem with authentic Christian tradition but I find it strange that Protestants would lapse into this heretical Catholic practice.

Was not aware before now.

Not a Protestant, except by the uniquely RCC definition that suggests that any Christian who is not a member of the RCC is a Protestant. (Another one of many blatant and conspicuous RCC teaching errors.)

Primarily, some Lutherans and some other denominations that have labeled themselves as such, are Protestant groups of churches. Not all Christian assemblies, congregations and fellowships grew out of the Lutheran and other Protestant church groups, and thus out of the RCC before that.

The RCC can change many things, but not the truth.

Ridiculous! Protestants believe in tradition. What they don’t believe in is elevating tradition over Scripture, which is what Rome does.