I'm not asking anyone to believe what I say based on my own authority - I have none - but on the authority of the word of God. The Bereans were "more noble" than others because they received the gospel with eagerness and referred to the sacred Scriptures to ensure that they remained true to the teachings of God. If we are supposed to blindly accept the authority of others based on the claims they make for themselves, then why in so many places are we exhorted to "test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world" (I Jn. 4:1) or "Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves" (Matt. 7:15) or "But examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good" (I Thess. 5:21)? What do we have that enables us to do that if not the word of God?
What "qualifies" a person to judge Apostolic teaching? Was Paul wrong to confront Peter, "But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. For prior to the coming of certain men from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles; but when they came, he began to withdraw and hold himself aloof, fearing the party of the circumcision." (Galatians 2:11,12)?
Did Peter, as an Apostle, have absolute authority so that NO ONE could challenge his acts or teaching? Or was Paul justified in calling him out and exposing his duplicity? What gave Paul the authority to do that? Can only Apostles challenge other Apostles? DO you contend that we have living Apostles today? You either receive or reject that teachings of the Holy Spirit as they have been written down for us as our "rule of faith". No man has authority OVER the word, but must be in subjection to it as unto the Lord because it IS from God.