I think information was given in a way that those at the time it was given would/could understand.
Scientists do the same today, they dumb down what they are saying for an audience that couldn't grasp what they were saying otherwise.
>>I do not believe that the letters and revelations in the bible were meant to be used by future generations as science books.
I think information was given in a way that those at the time it was given would/could understand.
Scientists do the same today, they dumb down what they are saying for an audience that couldn’t grasp what they were saying otherwise.<<
This is the Religion forum and certain avenues of discussion are discouraged.
At this time the question is the veracity of the Pope’s statement and how it ties into to Scripture (which it does perfectly).
and I dont believe that science books that lie about creation were meant to describe what God did, either
it is a fairy tale to believe you are related to a salamander or an ape, and in fact, you should be put in an insane asylum for believing that your relatives had gills like a fish once
it is the height of insanity to believe in evolution