Replies

I'm not sure why you assume the worst about me, as a person, boatbums.

I don't think it's advisable to try to ascertain my motives for rebutting your threads, I assume nothing about you, personally. It's been apparent for some time that the threads you post are designed to combat "Protestantism", or those who do not follow Roman Catholicism. I've yet to see anything from you that is truly "objective". It was easy to see through the facade of this series and is why I challenged you in your reply to Daniel1212. As for Pope Alexander VI, it seems you have skipped right past the negatives and ignored the objective things everyone already knows about him. He didn't make it to the list of the Ten Worst Popes for nothing.

"I don't think it's advisable to try to ascertain my motives for rebutting your threads..."

boatbums, you said that I am posting things "based on deception, semantics and rationalizations". You also said that I "target others with lipstick covered pigs".

Now, you say that I "have [intentionally?] skipped right past the negatives and ignored the objective things everyone already knows about him."

You have made this personal, maybe even in violation of the rules here on FR. You are not establishing what you are saying, only throwing out insults and repeating the same canards that I am writing this series to answer.

Check my sources, if you wish, and point out whatever errors I may espouse, but be prepared to defend your assertions and refrain from attacking me personally.