[matthewrobertolson]

"I don't think it's advisable to try to ascertain my motives for rebutting your threads..."

boatbums, you said that I am posting things "based on deception, semantics and rationalizations". You also said that I "target others with lipstick covered pigs".

Now, you say that I "have [intentionally?] skipped right past the negatives and ignored the objective things everyone already knows about him."

You have made this personal, maybe even in violation of the rules here on FR. You are not establishing what you are saying, only throwing out insults and repeating the same canards that I am writing this series to answer.

Check my sources, if you wish, and point out whatever errors I may espouse, but be prepared to defend your assertions and refrain from attacking me personally.

[Alex Murphy]

You have made this personal, maybe even in violation of the rules here on FR.

Are you aware of the rules that apply in cases when the article author is also a FReeper?