Typical totalitarian thinking. Buchanan simply cannot have an opinion, he has to be dishonest. How does the author know he is dishonest. Did he talk to Buchanan before hand, and Buchanan told him he thought otherwise than what he wrote. Totalitarians cannot stand others whose opinion deviates from their own. Anybody who dissents is dishonest, evil you might say.
Pat Buchanan knows as well as anybody --- or should know --- that on a topic as important as the defense of Doctrine, you've got to be accurate. Mills carefully explains why.
"Carefully explaining why" is not a totalitarian tactic.
See: