[Mrs. Don-o]

I think you have generalized something which was, in fact, quite specific: a particular piece of writing by Pat Buchanan which was full of rhetorical cheap tricks.

Pat Buchanan knows as well as anybody --- or should know --- that on a topic as important as the defense of Doctrine, you've got to be accurate. Mills carefully explains why.

"Carefully explaining why" is not a totalitarian tactic.

See:

#13

[NKP_Vet]

Buchanan was right on the money with his criticism of Francis. Study Francis’ time in Argentina and it all makes sense what he trying to do with the Church. Francis is liberal, who cares not one iota about Church tradition and Church doctrine. Kuddos to the great Pat Buchanan for pointing that out. It is also un-Catholic not to criticise the pope if you feel he is leading the church astray.