To: Steelfish
What if the author is correct about it being used in an Easter Ritual, AND the reason they used that piece of cloth was because it was reputed to be the burial cloth of Christ ?
8 posted on
10/23/2014 9:13:07 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: UCANSEE2
I believe that pollen studies on the fabric ,
indicate that the shroud is from an earlier era.
To: UCANSEE2
Better, more scientific men than he have examined the negative image that is almost photographically imprinted into the very fibers of the fabric and came away scratching their heads. The naysayer’s name is Fischer? Jewish, possibly? If so, I would not consider him a prime candidate to render an opinion on a Christian relic; especially after numerous true scientists have exhaustively examined the negative image on the shroud and are at a loss to explain, scientifically, how it got there.
10 posted on
10/23/2014 9:31:05 PM PDT by
Tucker39
(Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
To: UCANSEE2
What if the author is correct about it being used in an Easter Ritual, AND the reason they used that piece of cloth was because it was reputed to be the burial cloth of Christ? There ya go...using logic again.
39 posted on
10/24/2014 7:23:34 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are not inclined to commit crimes.)
To: UCANSEE2
Years after the Easter Festival the shroud was sold as an authentic to gullibles that bought it to increase their parish prestige and offerings
66 posted on
10/25/2014 4:40:50 PM PDT by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson