Romanist denials would be way funnier if so many souls were not being held in bondage 'neath layers of ridiculous religiosity.
The modern-day theologian I was quoting was not/is not himself so much wrapped up in religiosity (as far as I can tell) yet his own words in that particular book do very much undermine your own contentions.
Would you care to know who that theologian is?
“Romanist”
And there we see the usual Protestant usage of pejoratives.
“Would you care to know who that theologian is?”
Since it is irrelevant it doesn’t matter in any case.
Think it was read at all?
Or just scoffed and and ignored?