“What “false” doctrines are those?”
His.
“Incorrect. The only things “they” gave up were the novel dogmas...”
Protestantism was a novelty. As Alistair McGrath mentions Luther introduced novelties into theology. It’s just that simple.
Why should the opinions of an Anglican priest matter? He's not a Protestant. If you cannot even name what those "novel" or "false" doctrines are, what's the point of your continued comments? You've made no secret of your contempt and disgust of "Protestants" and "Protestantism". Using Free Republic's Religion Forum for your own personal diatribe soapbox seems like a waste of time if you think anyone will be swayed by such tactics. They won't be. It's just that simple!