“Are you living in LaLaLand?”
Nope. I am grounded in the teachings of the faith and good, old fashioned logic.
“Geez. Are you gay too and feel the need to go to ridiculous lengths to justify what the progressive priests in this Synod are attempting to do? What’s wrong with you.”
Absolutely nothing is wrong with me. And I am not “gay” nor am I a homosexual. I also am not going to any length at all to “justify what the progressive priests in this Synod are attempting to do”. I am merely pointing out the obvious. People keep saying the text says this or that when it actually doesn’t. I have no idea why people are making things up, making false claims, or are just being stupid but I refuse to be anything but accurate, precise and correct. Thus, if someone tells me that the word “sin” appears in the document when it is actually in the document, I can only disagree and point out the error (as I did). Please note, I might question your ability to argue these things logically - based upon your posts - but I would NEVER stoop to questioning your sexuality. You should be ashamed of yourself. What you did was disgusting and shameful.
“No one even knows if Michaelangelo was gay...”
You said no one KNEW. Past tense. As is someone from HIS OWN time. Most likely someone knew one way or the other.
“and you’re sitting there saying his lovers and confessors would know when you don’t even know if he had any.”
If Giovanni Cavalcante or Tommaso Cavalieri made it to heaven I’ll ask them if not Michelangelo himself. Deal?
“You are making stuff up out of whole cloth.”
Not one bit.
“Logic? You don’t have any.”
Actually, I clearly have far more than I’m going to see posted against me at this rate. Why don’t you just give up the pretense of any logical argument and just falsely accuse me of being a homosexual again? That seems to be your level of discourse at this point anyway.
“just falsely accuse me of being a homosexual again”
Nice lie. I asked you if you were gay, a logical question considering what you accused Michaelangelo of when he’s deader than a doornail and thus cannot defend himself about being a homo. I did not accuse you of being one, but asked if you were. Big difference, and you try to lie and twist my words. The Synod report also lied to cover up their saying “valued” homo’s (the first dictionary definition) claiming instead that the word was “evaluated” (a second dictionary definition) not the first. This wasn’t a mistranslation, it was a blatant effort to cover up what the authors of the report really meant. Seems both you and the Synod authors of the Report have problems with the truth.
P.S. as to “but I would NEVER stoop to questioning your sexuality. You should be ashamed of yourself. What you did was disgusting and shameful”, you had no problems whatsoever doing it to poor old Michaelangelo, did you. Shame on you.