http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3215644/posts
CNA/EWTN article
3rd paragraph:
After the issuance of the midterm report, the synod fathers raised their concern in 41 free interventions, which highlighted the absence of the word sin, the absence of the Gospel of Family, and some perhaps naive sentences of the document which could be subject to misinterpretation.
.................................
But then maybe CNA and EWTN are the ones that were “so wrong”?
....................................
“But then maybe CNA and EWTN are the ones that were “so wrong”?”
Apparently you and them - because as we just saw, the word “sin” is in the document. See below (again):
“Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less strong tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil; and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder.”