Replies

It "seems" to me that you are engaging in an attempt at mind-reading, which IS against the rules. Making a statement that speaks of no one Freeper in particular and stating an opinion that, "anyone who would combine passages of Scripture to make them say something they don’t shows a lack integrity and smacks of dishonesty", is NOT "making it personal". It is simply stating an opinion. May I presume that you would think the same if someone did that with Catechism passages?

It seems to me your argument is with Captain Teague, Keeper of the Code. I have privately appealed (ask nicely) to the Captain before, where he patiently explained where and why I had been found in violation of the code. It doesn't mean he's always going to be correct, and every judge must answer for his rulings (else The Supremes are going to get away with murder, yet he is the moderator and makes those decisions. It is tough to overturn precedent, and I would expect changes to established rules and precedents would always be advertised first and not applied retroactively.

It seems to me your argument is with Captain Teague, Keeper of the Code. I have privately appealed (ask nicely) to the Captain before, where he patiently explained where and why I had been found in violation of the code. It doesn't mean he's always going to be correct, and every judge must answer for his rulings (else The Supremes are going to get away with murder, yet he is the moderator and makes those decisions. It is tough to overturn precedent, and I would expect changes to established rules and precedents would always be advertised first and not applied retroactively.

Well, good morning! You seem quite sprightly and spry for someone who was lynched and stoned just yesterday. It's amazing how a night's sleep and dreams can be used for repair of body and soul.

It’s always someone else’s fault.

Nope! I respect our moderators too much to argue or question their judgment regarding the warnings they issue. My question to you still stands unanswered, though.