“Sure it is. The entire premise is equivocation.”
Your comment makes no sense.
“In one hand your cohorts appeal to post 70AD Jewish oral law and ignore the tradition that written Torah was always authoritative.”
False. We never ignore the standing of the Torah. What we don’t do is give it a standing it never had - as is necessitated by the false and heretical doctrine of sola scriptura.
The very formation of the Hebrew canon surely has an authoritative order thus we have TaNaKh. The pecking order is Law, Prophets, Writings.