1 posted on
09/19/2014 3:36:25 PM PDT by
NYer
To: Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; ...
But were not responding to the black mass performance in terms of religious liberty. They will be doing their satanic rituals in the future as they have in the pastand I suppose they have a right to do thatbut the nature of this black mass, in my view, is that it is not authentic religion; its really more akin to hate speech. Its a direct attack upon the Christian faith and the Catholic Mass and the Eucharist. Its deliberately intended to inflame and incite, so I dont think its necessarily a form of speech that is appropriate for a public venue. Not all speech is protected speech. If, for example, a group had desired to come and rent this same facility for the purpose of burning the Quran or lighting a cross in a racist, Ku Klux Klan sort of demonstration, or somehow committing anti-Semitic acts, I think the city likely would have found a reason to prevent that. Not all speech is protected speech. Bingo! Ping!
2 posted on
09/19/2014 3:37:23 PM PDT by
NYer
("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
To: NYer
“Ever since he first learned of a local satanic group’s plans to use a public theater to perform a “black mass,” Archbishop Paul S. Coakley of Oklahoma City has been urging public officials to cancel the event and asking Catholics to pray for that intention.”
Waste of effort and time that only leads to controversy and publicity.
It means nothing.
You should be more concerned about all the false religious stuff in that picture that is a total add-on to Christianity.
4 posted on
09/19/2014 3:52:26 PM PDT by
aMorePerfectUnion
( "I didn't leave the Central Oligarchy Party. It left me." - Ronaldus Maximus)
To: NYer
It has taken decades of fraudulent Scotus decisions to confuse Americans into thinking that license = liberty.
6 posted on
09/19/2014 4:00:49 PM PDT by
Jacquerie
(Article V. If not now, when?)
To: NYer
Satanism is not a 1st Amendment religion - that’s your legal argument. Take it all the way to SCOTUS. Get ‘er done.
7 posted on
09/19/2014 4:10:28 PM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: NYer
“whereas theres nothing fitting or appropriate between a statue of Satan and what takes place within the capitol.”
That’s certainly debatable.
9 posted on
09/19/2014 4:28:55 PM PDT by
Hugin
("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
To: NYer
Thanks for this post and kudos to Archbishop Coakley. Now is a good time, with all the Catholic hate out there and a large growth in Satanism (yes, locals in my area have bragged about their growth), to return to receiving Holy Communion on the tongue and kneeling. It is much harder to drop the Sacred Host and a lot easier to control its consumption rather than having it pocketed to be used in sacrilege.
To: NYer
Who are we to judge?
Need to start judging.
14 posted on
09/19/2014 4:59:34 PM PDT by
Ouchthatonehurt
("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
To: NYer
I suppose the Satanists will eventually have a float in NYC’s St. Patrick’s Day Parade. Bravo, yada yada.
19 posted on
09/19/2014 5:51:27 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(Conservatism is the political disposition of grown-ups.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson