The discussion was about indulgences back in post 2, your comment following and there abouts indicated that lack of education of some does qualify one to understand what indulgences are about.
The catholic history is ripe with these, as you know...and it doesn't require an “educational” degree to be aware of that.
“The discussion was about indulgences back in post 2, your comment following and there abouts indicated that lack of education of some does qualify one to understand what indulgences are about.”
No, I said this: “Arthur, when people only have a government school education they are capable of being misinformed on many topics.”
Thus, you have misrepresented what I said, AGAIN.
“The catholic history is ripe with these,”
“these” what? Ripe with “these” what? You’re not even making sense.
“as you know...”
That qualifies as “mind reading” which is a form of making it personal and against board rules. And you’re not even right. I have no idea what “these” are so how can I “know”?
“and it doesn’t require an “educational” degree to be aware of that.”
Aware of what? You didn’t even post a complete thought. “these”? “these” what?
Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.