Hmmm...curious...I understood everything BD said. Is this another overt attempt of yours to avoid a topic by asserting you have no idea what is being said or is it merely just another opportunity to insult, and you can’t let it pass you by? Perhaps an OPEN Religion Forum thread is not for you?
“Hmmm...curious...I understood everything BD said.”
Great. Now explain this:
“The general principles behind the term (neutrally considered) is much what is left over as to differences, after one gives Luther his due (as Ratzinger and others have done) then followed by considerations towards men such as (the late 16th century Anglican cleric) Hooker, who upheld there being necessity of Church as institution leaves the chief remaining additional difference be form of receptionism, which Ratzinger when speaking esoterically does not appear to hold great hostility towards.”
Seriously, what on earth does “is much what is left over as to differences” mean?
“Is this another overt attempt of yours to avoid a topic by asserting you have no idea what is being said or is it merely just another opportunity to insult, and you can’t let it pass you by?”
Nope. I really have NO IDEA WHAT HE IS TRYING TO SAY. The paragraph makes no sense.
“Perhaps an OPEN Religion Forum thread is not for you?”
We’ll see. Explain his paragraph, in detail. Have at it.