“Typical. You assume that your word is proof enough, but demand a different standard for your debaters.”
Typical. You assume that your baseless claims which are based on nothing at all apparently.
“In a debate, you lose.”
You never showed up for a debate. If you have not studied these things, then you know nothing about them.
“In real life you lose, because the entire world (except some whacky RC purists) knows the Inquisition was Catholic.”
Show me where I denied the inquisition was Catholic? The inquisition was a Roman invention used by bishops and then the papacy. If you’re going to accuse me of something at least get your facts straight.