Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
It is a bad move to take this to the Court. If the Supremes rule against the diocese, will that invalidate the Seal of the Confessional? Will the diocese then instruct its priests that a court order is enough to forsake their vows?

If so, then secular law trumps (and negates) canon law. If not, then why give the appearance of succumbing to man's ruling when you have no intention of obeying?

The Church should take the unequivocal stand and say "Under no circumstances whatsoever will our ministers break the Seal of Confession, the results of this appeal notwithstanding." And Catholics should stand ready to defend their Church if it comes to that.

30 posted on 09/06/2014 3:35:18 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack
If so, then secular law trumps (and negates) canon law. If not, then why give the appearance of succumbing to man's ruling when you have no intention of obeying?

The reason it's being taken this far is because there is a chance the SC may rule in their favor. If so, then it's a gained protection for the Church against any such future acts. So it's worth the effort even if they loose.

If they loose nothing will change. The priest still won't say anything for the rest if his life in or outside of jail. If he cares for his soul that is.

34 posted on 09/06/2014 3:47:58 PM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson