PN:Amazing. And how do you come to that conclusion?
Probably because he can read.
Gamecock:Everytime he says “I don’t know.”PN:Amazing. And how do you come to that conclusion?
Probably because he can read.
HA! One of the best responses on the thread, metmom! I didn't bother to count, but he must have said it at least a dozen times. I put Osteen on the same level as the "$58 seed money" "preacher."
“Read” is not an argument.
Presenting a Q&A session without distilling it into a cogent argument as proof of your assertion does not validate your argument. Your argument remains conclusory until you have shown how what is in the Q&A session proves your assertion. That simply hasn’t been done.