Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

“Read” is not an argument.

Presenting a Q&A session without distilling it into a cogent argument as proof of your assertion does not validate your argument. Your argument remains conclusory until you have shown how what is in the Q&A session proves your assertion. That simply hasn’t been done.


117 posted on 09/03/2014 12:36:08 PM PDT by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate over unjust law & government in the forum of ideas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: PapaNew

READ was not an argument, but a very significant word to end all of your arguments. She was pointing out to you exactly what Osteen said and didn’t say in a direct Q&A session and had you only READ it, you would know that your “messiah” refused to acknowledge Jesus as the ONLY Savior and the only way to Heaven as He said in the Bible.

Lemme see, Jesus said one thing, joel said another. Whom should I believe? (Hint: It is NOT a question.)

Go pour yourself a big ole cup of JoelAID and read what he said. Then you will realize that he contracted Jesus and therefore denied Him.


142 posted on 09/03/2014 6:39:28 PM PDT by Chong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson