You have attempted to assassinate the character of an anointed man of God and all you have to support your outrageous assertions and conclusions is your assertions about what others say. But what others say is not authoritative. What scripture says is.
All scripture [not Hank Hanegraaff and the doctrines and opinions of man] is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness (2 Tim 3:16).
Your attacks and accusations on Joel Osteen are hollow as you have demonstrated no ability to support them reasonably with scriptural evidence.
I feel like you, Gamecock, have a place in your heart that may be able to break free from this stuff. I hope so. But I feel I should warn you to stop attacking God's anointed (1 Chron 16:22; Psalm 105:15).
As I have said, if you have a legitimate beef with a minister of God that is Biblically based and supportable, that's another thing, as long as your motive is to help that minster or others from harm. But here, you have viciously attacked an anointed man of God with NO reasonable scriptural support or evidence and your motive doesn't appear to be that of healing but that of spite and contempt. That comes under the heading of allegiance with the accuser of the brethren himself.
I didn’t think so.
He may be a Christian but he is no minister of the Gospel.
That would be a *No*.