[BlackElk]

As it turns out, I not only agree with the bishop but also wit his right to say it. It would be helpful if the cited article had taken more trouble to better identify the bishop. In a time of spreading schism, describing one as a bishop no longer suffices. Examples: Bishop Fellay, Bishop de Mallerais. Bishop de Gallaraga, etc.

[narses]

” Examples: Bishop Fellay, Bishop de Mallerais. “

Both have valid orders of the fullest degree, recognized by Rome, even if indirectly, by the LIFTING of the excommunications. Or does that not mean anything to you? Are you starting to channel your inner “sinkspur” again?

[Brian Kopp DPM]

Most orthodox Catholics already know this good bishop quite well. Your ranting on this thread is deeply disturbing. You’ve let your animosity towards the SSPX make you look like a fool.

Full disclosure, I attend the Novus Ordo every day and a diocesan TLM on Sundays. I am not an SSPXer.

[ebb tide]

It would be even more helpful to take one minute of time to research the Bishop before blindly attacking him.

[Daffy]

Glad to hear you say it. It would seem though, it's not so much what is said, but who's saying it. For example, a cardinal archbishop may celebrate someones homosexual lifestyle (Bravo!) without any repercussion.

If I may add, where you see schism, others see counterrevolution. Obedience to injustice is not true obedience; “Take this prisoner out and shoot him.” Obedience to injustice is also an injustice.