It’s been interesting to me that he vehemently denies he is Catholic yet the premise of his thread is that he is often mistaken for one. It’s obvious to me that his walk talk is louder than his talk talk.
“It’s obvious to me that his walk talk is louder than his talk talk.”
What’s obvious to me is that most of you wouldn’t know an Anglican minister if if you bit one, because your Catholic hate is stronger than the little discernment you have.
Anglicans, and Lutherans too are different from Calvinists, Baptists, Congregationalists etc. in different matters of the Eucharist and dogma, and specifically in this case, the difference is in the role of the clergy.
Both Anglicans and Lutherans hold to Apostolic Succession -- so the newer groups of Protestants reject them
What he is complaining about in this specific case is that posters on internet forums like this one reject his Protestant beliefs just because they disagree with him about the nature of the ministerial priesthood.
Those who don't agree with him about the nature of the ministerial priesthood shouldn't treat him as dirt just because he disagrees with them