Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Evangelicals Bad for Marriage?
National Review ^ | 07/25/2014 | Maggie Gallagher

Posted on 07/25/2014 4:31:45 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

An April 2014 Urban Institute study predicts that if current marriage rates do not rebound, just 69 percent of Millennial women (and 65 percent of men) will marry by the age of 40. By contrast, in 1990, 91 percent of U.S.-born women had married by the age of 40.

Almost none of this retreat from marriage will be felt among college-educated white Americans. The majority of college-educated Millennials will marry and have their children in marriages that last until the death of one partner.

Meanwhile, the average American lives in a world where sex is plentiful but stable families are not, leading many a Millennial to conclude that there is little point in marriage at all. You can’t fail at what you don’t attempt.

Into this explosive disruption of the time-tested path to opportunity for America’s next generation comes a new marriage debate: Are evangelicals bad for marriage?

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: cathvsprot; divorce; evangelicals; marriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: Mrs. Don-o

RE: Article? There was an article connected to that headline?

Didn’t you click on the link?

Here it is:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/383714/are-evangelicals-bad-marriage-maggie-gallagher


41 posted on 07/25/2014 3:25:26 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thanks friend, That was sarcasm on my part. because of the posters on the thread who evidently didn’t read the article, or were unable to grasp the main points.


42 posted on 07/25/2014 3:40:12 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("The world will be saved by Beauty." - Fyodor Dostoyevsky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; count-your-change; CynicalBear; ...
Into this explosive disruption of the time-tested path to opportunity for America’s next generation comes a new marriage debate: Are evangelicals bad for marriage?

This is a hit piece against Evangelicals if ever I saw one.

43 posted on 07/25/2014 7:30:36 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The article never mentions any feud at all. If a feud starts, it will be because someone in this thread starts posting something touting his denomination and disparaging the other.

The author is already disparaging Evangelicals.

If someone is going to poke a sharp stick in the eye of the Evangelicals, they have no basis for complaints when Evangelicals poke back.

44 posted on 07/25/2014 7:32:37 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: metmom

The headline alone signals that


45 posted on 07/25/2014 11:10:37 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; redleghunter; ...
The article never mentions any feud at all. If a feud starts, it will be because someone in this thread starts posting something touting his denomination and disparaging the other.

Be realistic. Most only seem to read the headline and excerpt, and this is a war zone due to the incessant promotion of papists promoting their elitist org and attacking Protestant and evangelical faith, and who seek ammo against them, esp. in the light of the fact that the fruit of Rome is overall much more liberal .

Thus if you post an article with the headline, "Are Evangelicals Bad for Marriage?," you can expect a reaction akin to posting, "Are Catholics Bad for Marriage?"

But reading the article, we see that "evangelical" refers to those

"who continue to try to link not only children and marriage but also sex and marriage. The red-family model [which] abhors abortion, embraces abstinence education, worries about pushing contraception for unmarried teens (at least), and discourages divorce. And as

"divorce rates are higher in red states than in blue states. Conservative Protestant family values, they conclude, are bad for marriage: The blue-family model, Carbone and Cahn argue, is more successful at protecting marriage."

And thus by linking conservative values to faith and then to divorce rates it is really is saying that liberals are better at marriage. Thus liberal District of Columbia and MA (1+2 in lowest divorce rate) are better for marriage than Nevada and Oklahoma (the highest)*. But such marriages which product liberal 1.7 children families are bad for the nation. .

And of course, when people just cohabit in fornication, there is no marriage and thus no divorce.

However, race and economic factors are highly determinative. Lowest income helps one realize their need for God, and is where religious faith is strongest.

And broken down by race and ethnicity, the study found Asian women have the lowest first divorce rate at 10 divorces per 1,000 women in a first marriage. The first divorce rates of white and Hispanic women were similar at 16.3 and 18.1, respectively. African-American women have substantially higher rates of first divorce compared to all other racial and ethnic groups, at 30.4 divorces per 1,000 women in a first marriage...

The association between education and divorce is also curvilinear. The least (no high school diploma or GED) and the highest (college degree) educated women share the lowest rate of first divorce, with 14.4 and 14.2 per 1,000, respectively. - http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/11/111103161830.htm?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed

Meanwhile, as the article points out,

Charles E. Stokes, Amber Lapp, and David Lapp looked at divorce risk among religiously affiliated people who marry “early” (ages 18 to 26) and found that for both conservative Protestants and Catholics, church attendance (but not affiliation) dramatically reduces divorce.

Moreover [not in article], those who identify themselves as being conservative on social and political matters lower divorce rates (28%) than those liberal on social and political matters (37%). — http://www.barna.org/family-kids-articles/42-new-marriage-and-divorce-statistics-released

As regards Catholic versus Evangelical, this article attributes the higher divorce rate to "encouraging early family formation, less education," and which thus attacks conservative Catholics.

Meanwhile Catholics use contraception at a rate close to evangelicals (who did miss the boat on this), and as regards divorce rates,

the percentage of percentage of adults Protestants who have been married and divorced is 34% versus 28% for Catholics, while Evangelicals were at 26%. Atheists or agnostic were at 30% (only 65% were ever married, vs. 84% for born-again Christians) while those aligned with a non-Christian faith were at 38%. The largest disparity (17%) relative to divorce was between high and low income levels (22% to 39%). — http://www.barna.org/family-kids-articles/42-new-marriage-and-divorce-statistics-released

In addition, considering the wide scope of possible reasons why a marriage may be annulled, as an est. 400,000 marriages have been annulled since 1970 (http://articles.philly.com/1986-05-08/news/26049605_1_annulments-divorced-catholics-marriage), then how many RCs today are possibly in invalid marriages, though canon law presumes all marriages are valid until proven invalid?

*

Divorce rate by state[edit]

The following lists the number of divorces annually per 1,000 population in each state:

State Marriage rate Divorce rate[1]
1999 2000 2006 2008 2010 2011 1999 2000 2006 2008 2010 2011
District of Columbia 8.2 6.1 6.6 4.9 6.2 5.1 4.5 3.2 3.6 3.2 2.9 2.4
Massachusetts 7.9 7.1 6.2 5.8 6.2 5.9 2.8 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5
Georgia 10.3 8.4 7.8 6.8 6.1 6.5 5.5 5.1 4.1 3.3 3.1 2.5
Illinois 8.8 6.9 7.0 6.9 7.2 6.6 3.8 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.2 2.9
North Dakota 7.5 7.1 6.6 7.2 6.5 6.8 3.6 3.4 4.4 3.4 2.9 3.0
Pennsylvania 7.1 6.2 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
Minnesota 7.7 7.0 6.8 6.8 6.6 6.5 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1
Iowa 9.0 7.7 7.9 6.9 7.1 6.9 3.9 3.7 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.1
Wisconsin 7.9 7.0 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.3 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
Rhode Island 8.1 7.3 7.5 7.6 8.1 7.7 3.7 3.6 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.2
Connecticut 7.9 6.6 5.8 5.7 5.4 5.7 3.2 2.9 3.0 3.3 3.2 3.3
South Dakota 11.1 9.9 9.1 9.4 8.9 8.8 3.7 3.9 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.3
New Jersey 7.6 6.5 5.9 6.0 6.4 6.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.4
Maryland 9.7 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.0 7.1 3.4 3.0 3.2 3.3 2.9 3.4
New York 8.6 8.0 7.3 7.1 7.6 7.3 3.2 3.0 3.3 3.0 3.5 3.4
South Carolina 15.9 11.9 10.2 10.6 9.9 9.3 4.5 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.4
Delaware 8.4 7.3 6.7 6.5 6.5 6.4 4.4 5.0 4.5 3.9 3.9 3.5
Kansas 9.2 8.5 7.1 8.3 7.5 7.3 5.0 4.1 3.4 3.6 3.4 3.6
Nebraska 8.0 7.3 7.5 7.6 7.9 7.5 4.0 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.6
Hawaii 16.4 15.7 18.9 20.6 19.6 20.7 4.6 4.6 3.8 3.9 4.0 3.7
Michigan 8.2 7.3 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.5 4.3 4.1 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.8
Texas 10.5 9.9 9.1 9.4 9.1 8.4 5.5 5.2 3.8 4.0 4.0 3.9
Ohio 9.0 8.0 7.8 7.8 7.2 7.0 4.7 4.3 3.9 4.2 4.0 4.0
Montana 8.6 7.6 7.4 7.3 7.1 7.2 5.1 4.8 2.8 4.2 4.2 4.0
Missouri 9.6 8.3 8.1 7.8 7.5 7.3 5.1 5.0 4.4 4.5 4.2 4.0
Utah 11.2 10.7 9.6 10.8 10.2 10.4 5.1 4.4 4.0 4.3 4.2 4.1
Virginia 11.4 10.2 9.2 8.8 8.8 8.6 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.2
Vermont 10.9 10.3 10.0 10.0 9.8 9.7 4.5 4.7 4.4 4.1 4.3 4.2
New Hampshire 9.5 8.3 7.9 9.4 8.4 8.3 4.7 4.2 5.1 4.8 4.4 4.3
New Mexico 8.8 8.8 8.0 8.0 7.6 7.9 4.9 6.6 4.6 5.1 4.9 4.4
North Carolina 7.8 8.4 8.5 8.2 7.5 7.7 5.1 5.0 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.5
Washington 9.5 7.7 7.2 6.9 7.0 6.5 5.9 5.4 5.0 4.6 4.5 4.6
Oregon 8.9 8.1 7.6 7.6 7.5 7.1 5.5 4.7 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6
Alaska 10.2 9.0 8.6 8.9 8.1 8.3 5.5 5.0 5.0 3.9 4.3 4.6
Maine 9.7 8.7 8. 8.8 8.6 8.4 4.3 4.4 5.1 5.0 4.7 4.6
Arizona 10.0 8.8 8.2 7.5 7.5 6.6 6.9 6.2 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.7
Mississippi 9.4 7.9 7.8 6.9 6.5 6.4 5.5 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.9
Florida 10.9 9.9 8.7 8.9 9.2 9.4 6.3 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.2 5.1
Tennessee 13.9 15.5 14.7 15.5 13.5 13.1 6.5 6.2 5.8 5.9 5.2 5.1
West Virginia 7.2 6.1 7.5 8.7 7.9 8.1 5.3 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.2 5.2
Kentucky 13.5 12.2 10.9 9.8 9.0 9.0 5.8 5.9 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.2
Idaho 13.9 13.1 12.1 10.8 11.2 10.9 6.5 5.8 5.4 5.5 5.3 5.3
Wyoming 10.7 10.6 9.9 10.0 10.1 9.5 6.6 6.6 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.4
Alabama 10.6 9.8 10.8 10.1 9.4 9.8 6.1 6.0 5.7 5.5 5.4 5.4
Arkansas 15.3 14.4 14.8 15.4 14.3 14.3 6.9 6.3 6.2 6.4 6.2 6.2
Nevada 99.0 85.2 82.3 72.2 69.7 67.4 11.4 7.8 7.8 9.9 6.3 7.1
Oklahoma 10.6 8.6 6.8 7.7 6.6
California[2] 7.9 6.3 6.4 5.8 6.5 6.2 4.3
Indiana 9.6 8.6 8.1 7.9 7.9 7.8
Colorado 9.8 9.0 8.2 8.3 8.2 7.9 5.5 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.7
Louisiana 9.6 9.3 9.1 9.1 8.4 8.2
1 Includes annulments. Includes divorce petitions filed or legal separations for some counties or States.
2 Marriage data includes nonlicensed marriages registered.

46 posted on 07/26/2014 4:38:07 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So, which Christian denomination in America have proven good for marriage?

See above, and also ask, which kind of Christian denomination in America have marriages that are proven the best for America and the world?

47 posted on 07/26/2014 4:39:51 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: metmom
This is a hit piece against Evangelicals if ever I saw one.

It is as representing conservatives vs, liberals.

48 posted on 07/26/2014 4:41:38 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA
Welfare has virtually destroyed the black inner city family.

Related:

Black women are more likely to have a cohabitation end, and less likely to marry by age 30, likely to have a shorter marriage if they do marry for both first and second marriage, less likely to formally divorce if they marry then separate, less likely to cohabitate after a divorce, less likely to remarry, and less likely to have a successful second marriage. - http://www.psychpage.com/family/mod_couples_thx/cdc.html

Also,

Median Household Income by State[45]

Rank State 2009 2008 2007 2004–2006 Cost of Living Index[46] 2009 Data adjusted for COL base period
5 Hawaii $64,098 $67,214 $63,746 $60,681 165.56 $38,716
District of Columbia $59,290 $57,936 $54,317 $47,221 (2005)[47] 139.92 $42,374
4 Alaska $66,953 $68,460 $64,333 $57,639 132.64 $50,477
9 California $58,931 $61,021 $59,948 $53,770 132.56 $44,456
3 Connecticut $67,034 $68,595 $65,967 $59,972 130.22 $51,477
2 New Jersey $68,342 $70,378 $67,035 $64,169 128.47 $53,197
15 New York $54,659 $56,033 $53,514 $48,201 128.29 $42,606
1 Maryland $69,272 $70,545 $68,080 $62,372 124.81 $55,502
16 Rhode Island $54,119 $55,701 $53,568 $52,003 123.25 $43,910
20 Vermont $51,618 $52,104 $49,907 $51,622 120.38 $42,879
6 Massachusetts $64,081 $65,401 $62,365 $56,236 117.8 $54,398
7 New Hampshire $60,567 $63,731 $62,369 $60,489 116.68 $51,909
31 Maine $45,734 $46,581 $45,888 $45,040 116.42 $39,284
24 Oregon $48,457 $50,169 $48,730 $45,485 110.47 $43,864
11 Washington $56,548 $58,078 $55,591 $53,439 103.98 $54,384
23 Arizona $48,745 $50,958 $49,889 $46,729 103.73 $46,992
10 Delaware $56,860 $57,989 $54,610 $52,214 102.4 $55,527
12 Minnesota $55,616 $57,288 $55,082 $57,363 102.23 $54,403
13 Colorado $55,430 $56,993 $55,212 $54,039 102.23 $54,221
18 Nevada $53,341 $56,361 $55,062 $50,819 101.39 $52,610
22 Pennsylvania $49,520 $50,713 $48,576 $47,791 100.67 $49,190
43 Montana $42,322 $43,654 $43,531 $38,629 100 $42,322
41 New Mexico $43,028 $43,508 $41,452 $40,827 98.88 $43,515
39 South Carolina $44,625 $43,329 $40,822 98.71 $42,997
19 Wyoming $52,664 $53,207 $51,731 $47,227 98.66 $53,379
36 South Dakota $45,043 $46,032 $43,424 $44,624 98.53 $45,715
38 Florida $44,736 $47,778 $47,804 $44,448 98.39 $45,468
8 Virginia $59,330 $61,233 $59,562 $55,108 97.66 $60,752
21 Wisconsin $49,993 $52,094 $50,578 $48,874 96.45 $51,833
40 North Carolina $43,674 $46,549 $44,670 $42,061 96.21 $45,394
42 Louisiana $42,492 $43,733 $40,926 $37,943 96.15 $44,193
17 Illinois $53,966 $56,235 $54,124 $49,280 96.08 $56,168
27 North Dakota $47,827 $45,685 $43,753 $43,753 95.91 $49,867
34 Michigan $45,255 $48,591 $47,950 $47,064 95.25 $47,512
14 Utah $55,117 $56,633 $55,109 $55,179 95.15 $57,926
49 West Virginia $37,435 $37,989 $37,060 $37,227 94.4 $39,656
32 Indiana $45,424 $47,966 $47,448 $44,806 94.19 $48,226
26 Iowa $48,044 $48,980 $47,292 $47,489 93.98 $51,122
33 Ohio $45,395 $47,988 $46,597 $45,837 93.85 $48,370
37 Idaho $44,926 $47,576 $46,253 $46,395 93.04 $48,287
46 Alabama $40,489 $42,666 $40,554 $38,473 92.74 $43,659
50 Mississippi $36,646 $37,790 $36,338 $35,261 92.26 $39,720
29 Georgia $47,590 $50,861 $49,136 $46,841 92.21 $51,610
35 Missouri $45,229 $46,867 $45,114 $44,651 91.66 $49,344
28 Kansas $47,817 $50,177 $47,451 $44,264 91.31 $52,368
30 Nebraska $47,357 $49,693 $47,085 $48,126 91.09 $51,989
25 Texas $48,259 $50,043 $47,548 $43,425 91.04 $53,009
48 Arkansas $40,489 $41,393 $42,229 $41,679 90.61 $41,743
45 Oklahoma $41,664 $42,822 $41,567 $40,001 90.09 $46,247
44 Tennessee $41,725 $43,614 $42,367 $40,676 89.49 $46,625
47 Kentucky $40,072 $41,538 $40,267 $38,466 89.21 $44,919
United States $50,221 $52,029 $50,740 $46,242 (2005)[47] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States#Income_by_state

49 posted on 07/26/2014 4:50:51 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Thank you for your useful information.


50 posted on 07/26/2014 4:51:57 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: avenir
The feud is doctrinal, wherefore it has persisted. Internet forums tend to be nasty and brutal. FR is heavy on the Catholic side (from what I can tell). I like hearing the issues aired out. One can learn to filter out the huffing and puffing.

Indeed it is heavy on the Catholic side, due to certain RCs misusing FR as a Catholic news and apologetics site.

51 posted on 07/26/2014 4:52:22 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; ealgeone
This is akin to asking are catholics bad for conservatism in the US? Considering 56% voted for Obama in 2008; 50% in 2012; the northeast is majority catholic and they send liberal dimocrats to the sinate and house.

These numbers are false. 8 out of 10 white Protestants voted for Romney...95% of black Protestants voted for Obama...

Not counting blacks would eliminate 6% of evangelicals (15% of blacks), and 5% of Catholics.

More

"let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath:" (James 1:19)

52 posted on 07/26/2014 5:00:16 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever
Thank you for your useful information.

And thank God we have and can post it. So far.

53 posted on 07/26/2014 5:02:01 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

“Neither is hard work, political awareness, community involvement or morality.”

Neither is what used to be known as “The American Dream” — home ownership, etc. IIRC, studies have shown that this age group is primarily focused on the technology they can own and having the latest gizmo.


54 posted on 07/26/2014 5:12:14 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Actually I don’t see it relating to denominations at all.

I see it as more relating to the couple’s SERIOUSNESS about their faith.

Those who attend church regularly have a significantly lower divorce rate than those who don’t REGARDLESS of denomination.


55 posted on 07/26/2014 5:27:52 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Amen, Daniel. They try to make Catholics instead of followers of Christ. I do not understand that attitude at all.


56 posted on 07/26/2014 6:26:49 AM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; MamaB; metmom
Actually I don’t see it relating to denominations at all. I see it as more relating to the couple’s SERIOUSNESS about their faith. Those who attend church regularly have a significantly lower divorce rate than those who don’t REGARDLESS of denomination.

That aspect is true, and today we might vote for Pharisees due to moral values, and if divorce rate was the criteria for the right religion, then the the faith of Asian culture would seem to win.

"For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:" (Romans 2:14)

"And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law?" (Romans 2:27)

While having many conservative values alone is not what defines true faith, yet having overall contrary values constitutes wrong faith. One can be a conservative without being a Christian, but one cannot be a Christian and not be a conservative in Scriptural conformity in faith and morals.

And while SS is attacked by RCs are promoting immorality, yet the group that is the most commitment to Scripture as literally being the Word of God are the most conservative btwn the two.

Evangelical Protestants are the most politically conservative Christian tradition. Within each tradition, those with literal views of the Bible are more politically conservative than is their tradition overall. Catholics that are Biblical literalists (11.8%) hold more conservative political views than the Catholic population in general does. The Biblical literalist Catholic is as politically conservative as the Biblical literalist who is Evangelical (47.8%) or Mainline Protestant. (11.2%) American Piety in the 21st Century, Baylor Institute for Studies of Religion http://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php/33304.pdf

57 posted on 07/26/2014 8:29:19 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

57 replies and the only mention of SIN is to be found in a tagline...


58 posted on 07/26/2014 6:38:43 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson