***************************************
You just included every goat humper in Saudi Arabia who (with his Imams permission) raped his wifes corpse prior to marrying his 11 year old cousin... THAT'S RACIST!
Posted on 07/23/2014 2:40:56 AM PDT by markomalley
In 1965, Lyndon Johnson prohibited Federal discrimination in hiring based on race, religion, gender and nationality. President Obama’s latest executive order amends that to include sexual orientation and gender identity. In 1969, Richard Nixon prohibited any sort of discrimination in Federal employment practices based on race, religion, gender, nationality, age or disability. Bill Clinton later amended this to include sexual orientation. President Obama’s new executive order amends it to include gender identity. This applies to all organizations which receive federal contracts. What’s next?
Just about anything could be next, because this latest executive order is completely divorced from reality. It views gender as a social construct or a psychological attitude unrelated to our biological sexuality. Instead of viewing an estrangement from our bodies as a problem, the new executive order insists that behavior based on such a disjunction must be upheld and honored as good. Apparently, we are what we want to be, and nobody can contradict us based on evidence.
Of course, there is nothing really new here. The gay revolution, and particularly the drive for gay marriage, is based on a total repudiation of our reproductive functions as reasonable and moral indicators of sexual behavior. There is a flight from reality at the center of sexual politics which would be almost funny if its personal and social consequences were not so deadly. Even setting spiritual consequences aside, the personal price tag is way too high in terms of health, psychological stability, and even life span. If we add these costs to the destruction of the family, the social and economic results are similarly catastrophic.
It seems to be our lot to witness the end of a civilization. We can trace its death to the empire of desire. Clearly, this pleasure principle began to affect us in unusually deep ways with the wholesale separation of sex from life in contraception. Since then, it seems, there has been no turning back. Our deadly divorce from reality now seems all but irrevocable.
Spiritual Collapse?
It has been truly astonishing to witness the dramatic change of socially dominant opinion on these issues over the past two generations. We have gone from a rebellion against the “restrictive conventions” of sexual identity and morality in the 1960s to the establishment of an entirely reversed set of conventions, already imposed with far greater rigor in both education and policy, all in the space of about fifty years. Nature, strengthened by spiritual formation, has been replaced by desire, legitimated by political diktat.
Nobody likes to deny another person’s desires, lest our own desires should ever be similarly thwarted. And so we have raced from a condemnation of the perverse, to a tongue-in-cheek “not that there is anything wrong with it”, to the acceptance of change on behalf of others, to the moral condemnation of any who dare oppose the latest trend. As President Obama sagely noted yesterday, “We’re on the right side of history.” Of course, this is exactly like the Emperor in Star Wars saying “Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.”
But do the spiritually blind ever really see? No, and what is even worse, the blindness can sometimes still be found in our own ranks. In a Catholic school system in Vancouver, Canada, when parents of a transgendered boy (who now prefers to live as a girl) complained about their boy not being allowed to use the girls’ bathroom, the administration hastened to devise a new policy. The schools in question will now make ample provision for students who “express their gender in ways that are different from prevailing stereotypes.” What did I just say about diktat?
Moreover, because President Obama deliberately refused to include a religious exemption in his latest executive order, and since court cases have been as uneven as they are unpredictable, we can expect to see other Catholic institutions go along to get along. Dare we hope for resistance by the majority? Perhaps, but it would be historically unusual. At the level of formal compliance, at least, politics tends to trump religion. One certainly expects a certain spiritual dodginess. But will our Catholic maneuvers to be truly “deft” or just plain “shifty”?
God and Politics
Driving down the road to destruction yesterday, I saw an old “Catholics for Obama” bumper sticker. It has its analogues all over the world! How, I wondered, can people fail to see the seeds of a broken future in the heady utopian politics of the present? What causes an entire population to hide from reality, to assume that happiness will grow if we simply refuse to call bad things evil? “How beautiful,” says Isaiah, “are the feet of him who brings tidings of good, who publishes salvation, who says to Zion, ‘Your God reigns’” Is 52:7). But this does not seem so to us: To shoot our messengers is surely an act of ultimate despair.
Sex is God’s marvelous gift for making babies in the wedded love of family. Families are for nurturing children in the security of life-long commitment. Men and women together mirror the wholeness of God, and in their families they participate in God’s incomparable fecundity. Those who cannot (or are not called to) mirror God’s fecundity in their own flesh, are called to mirror it in other ways, for all are made in the image of God’s Trinitarian love. So it is that countless families combine to form full-fledged societies, imbued with solidarity, raising up rich and varied civilizations to the glory of the Creator.
Yet it is just this that we have forgotten, that our blessed dominion begins with an act of creation: “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” (Gn 1:27). If awareness of this primal gift is lost, what will follow? Polygamy? Pedophilia? Bestiality? Termination of the sexually irrelevant? Life in the test tube and the petri dish? Nurture by the State? Exploitation of all by all? This and even worse than this! I do not say we have reached the antichrist or the end, but I do say we should be grateful that God always shortens the days for those with Faith (Mt 24:22; Mk 13:20). For we are certainly witnessing the wholesale substitution of man’s plans for God’s. We are witnessing the substitution of politics for love.
17. Responsible men can become more deeply convinced of the truth of the doctrine laid down by the Church on this issue if they reflect on the consequences of methods and plans for artificial birth control. Let them first consider how easily this course of action could open wide the way for marital infidelity and a general lowering of moral standards. Not much experience is needed to be fully aware of human weakness and to understand that human beings—and especially the young, who are so exposed to temptation—need incentives to keep the moral law, and it is an evil thing to make it easy for them to break that law. Another effect that gives cause for alarm is that a man who grows accustomed to the use of contraceptive methods may forget the reverence due to a woman, and, disregarding her physical and emotional equilibrium, reduce her to being a mere instrument for the satisfaction of his own desires, no longer considering her as his partner whom he should surround with care and affection.
Finally, careful consideration should be given to the danger of this power passing into the hands of those public authorities who care little for the precepts of the moral law. Who will blame a government which in its attempt to resolve the problems affecting an entire country resorts to the same measures as are regarded as lawful by married people in the solution of a particular family difficulty? Who will prevent public authorities from favoring those contraceptive methods which they consider more effective? Should they regard this as necessary, they may even impose their use on everyone. It could well happen, therefore, that when people, either individually or in family or social life, experience the inherent difficulties of the divine law and are determined to avoid them, they may give into the hands of public authorities the power to intervene in the most personal and intimate responsibility of husband and wife.
- Pope Paul VI, Humanae Vitae
Please note that these problems were already happening in 1968. However, with the wide availability of oral contraceptives, public morals took a massive landslide.
I don't know where the bottom is -- every time that I thought we couldn't get worse, we got worse. I don't even bother saying "it can't get any more perverse" anymore...as I know I'll be proven wrong.
Polygamy, then incest and then NAMBLA style relationships.
That's the point: you think that's as low as they can go. It's not.
Presidential executive orders are only to be used for the Executive branch ruled the Supreme Court many years ago. Pray that the court will uphold this yet again as we don’t want a king in this nation again save the Lord Jesus Christ.
I got two questions when hiring.
Can they do the job or learn the job?
Are they left handed?
I know, that one sounds odd, but the shop started out as just me, so everything is set up for southpaws. I’d prefer not to pay comp to some rightie who gets hurt.
Everything else is of supreme indifference to me and should be to most employers.
I have asked the following question at work: If we are allowed to choose our gender identity at will, or if there are so many forms of gender identity, why can’t we choose our racial identity? The legal basis to do so seems to be the same.
***************************************
You just included every goat humper in Saudi Arabia who (with his Imams permission) raped his wifes corpse prior to marrying his 11 year old cousin... THAT'S RACIST!
I have asked the following question at work: If we are allowed to choose our gender identity at will, or if there are so many forms of gender identity, why can’t we choose our racial identity? The legal basis to do so seems to be the same.
*************************
Absolutely right , and the common thread is increased access to money or government favors ... That should be something a conservative (legal) group should take on as a project. I’d like to see me (a male) be denied state favoritism in a contract if I “decide” I’m a black female.
They will dig six feet under...
If that is the direction then eventually child sex becomes mandatory
ever read “Brave New World”??
beastiality
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.