Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: piusv

But the “more traditional” are not really traditional. They just “prefer” the Latin Mass.

...if by the ‘Latin Mass’ you refer to the Pian Mass codified subsequent to the Council of Trent, well, reverence and love of that Mass makes you as traditional as you can get...of course, the Pauline Mass of 1969 was promulgated in Latin, and can be, and has been, celebrated thusly, and therefore,properly termed the ‘Latin Mass’...

...at any rate, nobody I’ve encountered at our local TLM has any love for VatII; that they may refrain from badmouthing those who do attend the Novus Ordo does not speak to any lack of reverence for the tradition and Deposit of Faith...and as for contending with VatII, exactly what is it you expect a traditionally minded Catholic, who is just seeking a more reverent, meaningful worship experience, to actually do...


10 posted on 07/14/2014 2:10:34 PM PDT by IrishBrigade (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: IrishBrigade

to go beyond the “ambiguity” talk; to go beyond the liturgical abuses talk.

Vatican II made changes in the areas of religious liberty and ecumenism. Traditional Catholics recognize the problem with VII goes well beyond ambiguity and abuses. Traditional Catholics recognize the modernism at work within the Council and the modernism that continues to infiltrate the Church.


12 posted on 07/14/2014 2:15:46 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson