Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Campion
Quite wrong, but by all means don't read the article and continue in your ignorance.

For those actually interested in the plaintiffs complaint:

The petitioners claim[ed] Bayhi was negligent in advising the minor regarding the alleged abuse and failed his duty as a mandatory reporter in compliance with the Louisiana Children's Code. It also holds the diocese liable for failing to properly train the priest regarding mandatory reporting of sexual abuse of minors.

The priest effectively shielded the perpetrator by failing to properly report the crime, and by failing to advise the victim of the proper course of action. That amounts to protecting the molester, regardless of whose confession he heard.

23 posted on 07/08/2014 4:47:12 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: FredZarguna
effectively shielded the perpetrator

By treating this girl's confession with exactly the same confidentiality he treated everyone else's confession?

It doesn't matter. This is a non-negotiable for us. You can put every priest in the US in prison for life if you wish, "compelling state interest" be d-mned.

42 posted on 07/08/2014 6:21:12 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson