Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna; BlackElk
Nobody is free to exercise his religion when the state can show a compelling interest. That’s the Federal case law concerning the First Amendment, and it has been for many years.

Pinging for your learned input.

21 posted on 07/08/2014 4:15:03 PM PDT by verga (Conservative, leaning libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: verga
Don't take my word for it.

Take the word of Antonin Scalia, whom I assume no one on this board thinks is a "socialist" or anti-Christian.

Writing for a 6-3 majority in the case of Employment Division vs. Smith he wrote: "the Court has never held that an individual's religious beliefs excuse him from compliance with an otherwise valid law prohibiting conduct that government is free to regulate. Allowing exceptions to every state law or regulation affecting religion "would open the prospect of constitutionally required exemptions from civic obligations of almost every conceivable kind." Scalia cited as examples compulsory military service, payment of taxes, vaccination requirements, and child-neglect laws.

24 posted on 07/08/2014 4:54:21 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson