I heard about one jury (from some attorneys at a priest’s trial who talked to jurists later) in which the foreman said as the jury convened, “Well, he’s a Catholic priest, now let’s prove he’s guilty.”
The trial proved that the priest was NOT guilty because he also worked at a Reform school and had records that proved he wasn’t there at the times when he was accused.
In too many states, it is far to easy to convict men of sexual abuse without any evidence other than the word of a child, whose testimony if often easily manipulated by psychologists and law enforcement.