Has nothing to do with that, does it??? It has to do with you adding words to scripture to try to justify your false theology...It's all about honesty...
If those things Jesus did were important for us to know the details, he would have told us...THEN...He certainly didn't tell anyone in your religion about them Centuries later...
And again, this is the point of contention. You are certainly adding to Scripture when you clam it says anywhere that itself, is the ONLY source of Truth!
This is what you are not getting, or stubbornly refusing to admit. When you show me a Scripture that says, "Scripture ALONE is the source of ALL truth (about Christianity)" then we will talk further.
Until then, I'm not bound by your rule (and hence a man made rule) that says "If those things Jesus did were important for us to know the details, he would have told us...THEN..."
You see my FRiend, you keep wanting me to play your game by your rules. "Show me that in the Bible or else it's not true". You, and all the other anti-Catholic Christians may be able to sucker other Catholics into playing that silly game but NOT me. You will FIRST demonstrate sola scriptura from Scripture or will be ignored
Now, do you want to answer my final question to you? Because I think it will be helpful in this regard:
You cited John 5:39 & 46-47. Luke 24:27 & 44.
Would you agree that what is described in those passages is also what is described, at least in part, in Acts 17:1-11?
Yes or no please.