Yes, while I find the repeated use of that word offensive, it was your post 894 that triggered my reproving question. I did not write about it until you introduced intimate relations between what I understood as a Jew and his wife into the discussion. If you excluded Jews, including Jews who believe in Jesus as Messiah, from the equation, I would have ignored it. I did not realize you were not speaking of a Jew. Honestly, I found the focus on that intimacy a bit creepy in that context but going back I see you introduced it before in a longer post. I think trying to get Gentiles to follow Torah is dangerous from several angles and historically gets Jews killed; so many of the Gentiles who name the name do not obey the most basic commandments in the New Testament, otherwise they would be one as he prayed. You can resume telling the Gentiles not to live as Jews. I'm fine with that.
That was not when you made the protest about the word "Judaizer," but it is when you censored me as expressing what you saw as antisemitic, antiChristian, and unclean words, rashly supposing i was addressing typical Jews, not Messianic believers who mock the full newness of the New Covenant.
I did not realize you were not speaking of a Jews. Honestly, I found the focus on that intimacy a bit creepy in that context but going back I see you introduced it before in a longer post...You can resume telling the Gentiles not to live as Jews. I'm fine with that.
It is not at all "creepy," but thanks for your permission to do what Scripture shows, and for finally, if not straight forwardly, admitting that your response was rash, out of context, and unwarranted.
Better hunting next time.
The end.