Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212
Thus since these can be misunderstood by the unlearned and unstable who wrest such to their own damnation, not understanding context, as you evidently failed to do with me, then you need to censor the Lord and His Spirit for using words that may appear to be "antisemitic, antiChristian, and unclean." Or whatever.

No, I do not need to censor the LORD in any fashion whatsoever. I already made my objections to a word, which does not appear in the Scriptures, clear. I suggested using words which actually appear in the Scriptures, and see that suggestion has been rejected.

1,301 posted on 07/22/2014 6:53:52 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1298 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_1981; Springfield Reformer
No, I do not need to censor the LORD in any fashion whatsoever. I already made my objections to a word, which does not appear in the Scriptures, clear.

No, you originally said nothing about one word being the issue, but instead you mentioned "words" in response to my reproof of the inconsistency of those who impose keeping all the ceremonial law, which is what Paul censored, even (according to your NAB) wishing they were castrated, while as shown, using words that were objectionable to both Gentiles and Jews:

But all those Judaizers who even had marital relations last night must remain unclean till the evening. (Leviticus 15:16-18) I wonder how many observe that one.

Are you trying to mock the Torah and the Jews ? Perhaps you should reflect on your words and understand how antisemitic, antiChristian, and unclean

Are you trying to mock the Torah and the Jews ? Perhaps you should reflect on your words and understand how antisemitic, antiChristian, and unclean they appear appear

You only began the focus on "Judaizier" after the rash unwarranted nature of your protest was exposed, while i was not even addressing the Torah Observant Jews, but as per NT judgment, those who profess faith in the Lord Jesus, which the former find offensive.

Moreover, objecting that the word "Judaizier " is not found in Scripture is desperate, as such a word as "Trinity" is also not found, and is objectionable to Jews, while Judaizier is also used by RC scholarship .

Thus to be consistent, you do need to reprove the Holy Spirit, and your own church, and as your reproof me also has no warrant, your only recourse is again to revert to the "I trust them and not you" tactic, and again bring out the thought police in you:

Are your thoughts and behavior pure now, or are they impure and contentious, that you would ask such a question to mock the Law of Moses given by God, and the LORD Jesus Christ who already told us:

And here again i was not at all mocking the Law of Moses, but (if you cared about context rather than going off half cocked) instead those who profess to be Christians but mock the New Covenant by requiring literal observance of the ceremonial law.

Your application at MSNBC is pending.

1,302 posted on 07/22/2014 10:04:09 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1301 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson