#119 is an excellent excellent reply certainly better than anything I’ve tried. But we shall see if, once again, Daniel returns to the question, “What is the basis for assurance in all of what you describe to me Mrs Don-o?” (Which has essentially been his responses to me every time when I have given similar responses/evidence)
All the while of course again, never answering his own question unless directly challenged and even then, only to assert “Scripture”. Neglecting of course the fact of his opinion on Scripture as well.
But perhaps I’m too jaded. We shall see what he says. I certainly can’t read minds (although sometimes it seems in these circular discussions it seems I can)