Throwing out part of the Old Testament is an explicitly anti-Christ, anti-Christian, Pharisee dictate.
Neither Christ or the Apostles ever once in any way implied any portion of the Septuagint shouldn't be accepted as the inspired Word of God.
If that's the "whole bit" you mean you've hit upon the easiest way to identify modern day Pharisees, they obey anti-Christ, anti-Christian, Pharisees and throw out portions of His Holy Word to avoid the Truth contained in those portions of Scripture.
Pharisees didn't like how clearly those portions of Scripture laid out exactly what Christ and the Apostles taught and early Christians practiced.
Luther knew The One, Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church Jesus Christ Himself founded preached, taught, and practiced exactly the same way the early Christians did and so he resorted to the same elimination of Scripture as a means to hide his evasions of the Truth.
People who prefer Pharisees and Luther to Christ will one day hear, "I never knew you" from the very same Jesus Christ they imply is a liar by pretending the Holy Spirit cannot and did not protect His Holy Word from the inclusion of error.
Your comment might have some effect if there was proof of some authority to dictate any canon, not to mention authority to amend the Tanakh - Canon being an invention of the Roman church...
Neither Christ or the Apostles ever once in any way implied any portion of the Septuagint shouldn't be accepted as the inspired Word of God.
Your mistake is in presupposing the Septuagint was what was used... which is by no means convincing. Further, one would have to prove the acceptance of the anagignoskomena within the jurisdiction of Jerusalem - That being one of the hot spots between the Temple Faithful and the Libertine sect (Greek, Alexandrian Jews).
If that's the "whole bit" you mean you've hit upon the easiest way to identify modern day Pharisees, they obey anti-Christ, anti-Christian, Pharisees and throw out portions of His Holy Word to avoid the Truth contained in those portions of Scripture.
No, the violation of the Pharisees, and their signature, is the promulgation of their oral torah (their tradition) as equal to or in many cases above, Moses' written Torah and associated books composing the Tanakh, including the prophets... In every case, Yeshua stood against their traditions.
The One, Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church Jesus Christ Himself founded
PROVE IT. You can't.
I wonder where ol' Martin ever got an idea like that???
Jerome (325-420 A.D.) The Biblical scholar of his day, and the translator of the Catholic Bible, the Latin Vulgate, clearly agreed with the Hebrew canon, being limited 39 books of the present Old Testament to the exclusion of the additional books of the Apocrypha. With the rise of Christianity in the first century, the Septuagint (LXX[3]) was the Bible (Old Testament) used by the early church. The early members of the church felt no urge to denounce the additional writings (the apocrypha) which came along with the Greek translation (LXX) of the Hebrew Scriptures. These same books (Apocrypha) were not found in the Hebrew canon, the writers of the New Testament; though they quote from the Septuagint, do not quote from the Apocrypha. http://www.truthnet.org/Bible-Origins/6_The_Apocrypha_The_Septugint/
Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.” John 6:28-29
Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the works God requires?”