Forget it. Philip starts with the a priori assumption that most everything in Revelation happened in the past, never mind that Revelation itself demonstrates that this could not be true. You might as well talk to a wall.
>>>Forget it. Philip starts with the a priori assumption that most everything in Revelation happened in the past, never mind that Revelation itself demonstrates that this could not be true. You might as well talk to a wall.<<<
All you have presented is your opinion. Do you have any scripture to back up your claim?
Don’t hold your breath, everyone.
Philip
Phil believes in Preterism—nevermind that Matthew 24 is coming to pass before our very eyes now that Israel is a nation again.
He thinks Isaiah 17 already happened and that Antiochus Epiphanes is the dread A/C!!!!!!
Yep more fruitful to talk to those walls......