[BlueDragon]

I have already begun a small amount of telling of that which you inquire of. Go back abd read through some of my comments. I'm wasn't being cagey about not expressing some outline or description of my own beliefs. So -- asked and answered, at least in part.

But again, this is not about personal belief as much as it is about the beliefs which are said to be required by this allegedly infallible "magesterium".

But I see you won't answer anything of the sort.

[D-fendr]

If you want to just vent against the Church, perhaps a newbie would be a better discussion partner. You've gone on about your objections to Catholic dogma; what's your alternative?

I'm wasn't being cagey about not expressing some outline or description of my own beliefs.

So, without being cagey, what is your dogma?

[Elsie]

But again, this is not about personal belief as much as it is about the beliefs which are said to be required by this allegedly infallible "magesterium".

In the secular world; this is known as a committee.

Votes are taken, and majority rules.

I see nothing that makes corporation decisions absolutely right; why is RELIGION supposedly the ONLY one that can make them?

[Elsie]

... why is RELIGION supposedly the ONLY one that can make them?

And about the guys who voted in the MINORITY; shouldn't they be gotten rid of?

After all; they did NOT hear the Voice of GOD when deciding which way to vote.