“Their sacramental effectiveness, you noted, was clearly missing on six of the seven.”
What you’re saying doesn’t make sense. There is no such thing as “Their sacramental effectiveness”. I would never use such a phrase because the phrase is a logical impossibility.
“By deeming their efforts ineffective, you thus pronounce two things:”
Where did I EVER say ANYTHING about “their efforts ineffective”? You are completely making things up out of thin air now. I never said anything about “their efforts”.
“1. you are one holding the ability to judge effectiveness within the Catholic paradigm.”
Since you can’t even get what I said correct, your conclusion by necessity is most likely false. And, what effectiveness are you even talking about? You comments make absolutely no sense whatsoever.
“2. and, missing by six means the person is lost.”
Missing? “missing by six means the person is lost”? According to whom? Seriously, your comments are bizarre and clearly have nothing to do with anything I actually said.
“You were not merely observing, you were judging.”
Nope. But you are clearly judging what I said and yet you’re clearly doing it without even getting the facts of what I said correct.
“Don’t be bashful...step up and pound the chest.”
What on earth are you talking about? Your comments grow increasingly bizarre and incoherent.
“I was curious what the judge thought of their own effectiveness.”
What effectiveness? Your posts make no sense.
"They don’t do seven and clearly only one of the ones they have received has ever done any good."
Well, my FRiend, if you cannot read and understand the sense of your own post, it explains much about the problem with Catholicism.