Look at you! You are a proxy for the dispensational cult.
>>>You teach that the Day of the LORD and the resurrection of the saints has already come and gone. The Apostle Paul wrote about that to Timothy in two different sections.<<<
Not those tired, out of context arguments again? Are you trying to drag this out, hoping I will I will tire of your endless, barely identified verses?
When Paul wrote Timothy, the first resurrection has not occurred. What does that have to do with the first resurrection actually occurring in 70 AD? It means that Paul was expecting a resurrection in his generation, as were all other Christians; and some false teachers were telling others the resurrection had already occurred. That is all those verses mean, and anyone who teaches otherwise is a false teacher, like Hymenaeus and Alexander.
Now, explain to everyone what that has to do with what I believe, which is extremely well documented?
And what about you? Where is your proof the first resurrection did not occur in 70 AD? You have none, whatsoever. Even the book of Daniel exposes the false prophesies of the future rapture cult; and the cult members would realize that if they take the time to read it…carefully! Pay particular attention to the use of the phrase, "thy people." You can find it in Daniel 9:15,16,19, and 24; and in 10:14 and 11:14. Find the same phrase ("thy people") in chapter 12:1-2, and then determine who was resurrected, and how many? You will quickly notice that the first resurrection was only for "thy people:" namely, the children of Israel; exactly like I have been saying all along. The resurrection was also for "not all;" but "many." There were also both good and bad resurrected. All that flies in the face of the teachings of dispensationalists and futurists.
Philip
You missed the point; consider for a moment your assumptions are not true; you are then willfully guilty of the same heresy Paul, and the Holy Spirit, warned against.