Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie

I don’t bash protestants. But I do stand up for the Church that Christ started (the Catholic Church) each and every time some PROTESTant starts babbling on about how wicked the Catholic Church is. 2,000 years and counting, most Christians in the world are Catholic, but because a few thousand protestants say the Catholic Church is the work of the devil, well it must be.

“To be deep in history is to cease being Protestant” - John Henry Cardinal Newman


107 posted on 03/19/2014 3:02:21 PM PDT by NKP_Vet ("To be deep in history is to cease being Protestant" - John Henry Cardinal Newman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: NKP_Vet
“To be deep in history is to cease being Protestant” - John Henry Cardinal Newman

To be deep in Scripture is to cease being Catholic.

110 posted on 03/19/2014 4:03:34 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet
Schaff blew that Newman quote right out the water.

Schaffs more extensive work as to ECF's shows how needful the work he and others did was, and how wrong guys like Newman were.

To be deeper in history than Newman was, is to not come up with the excuses for Romish alterations and additions (to Christian theology) which Newman had to...

If one had been paying attention, reading carefully to see if their own assumptions, along with statements such as the Newman quote could be falsified (or need some modification), then it should have been obvious by now Newman was engaging in wishful thinking -- to justify his own conversion. But then again, Newman was operating under assumptions based in part upon limited work (from Oxford) in regards to ECF's that favored Romish perspective (a kind of cherry-picking of quotes and citation) which the more thorough work of Schaff and Co., revealed was not only lacking, but misleading -- and quite possibly deliberately so. And so the conversation continues to echo...much of the same old same old. But thank you, and other Romanists for providing the ample (and daily) opportunities for rebuttals of various aspects of Romanism.

Any theory -- including theology -- which is refuted by facts in evidence, stands to be reconsidered or adjusted, if only as to wording.

From there...it gets even more interesting, for various RCC wordings can mean different things to different people, being possibly true enough in one regard, but not so true if particular assumptions as to word definitions and in particular --- identification -- are not carefully enough weighed and considered.

Vatican II, anyone? How many times have [Roman] Catholics pointed at that RC magesterium product as being either a work of evil, or "misinterpreted" even by their own clerics?

It must be confusing to be a [Roman] Catholic. I feel sorry for 'em [sometimes].

111 posted on 03/19/2014 4:07:52 PM PDT by BlueDragon (You can observe a lot just by watching. Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet
I don’t bash protestants.
 
 
O...
   K...
 
Without a doubt you must be a LAPSED CATHOLIC. They are the absolute worst at spreading anti-Catholic bigotry. 
 
 We all know the 40,000 or so PROTESTants churchs that have been around for a couple of hundred years,
with a new one popping up on every street corner in the country that some loudmouth shyster can pay rent on,
are the real church and they all have it right. Just Pastor Billy Bob or Deacon Jerome.
 
 
 
 

123 posted on 03/19/2014 6:12:18 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson