John Huston played the role of Noah
Posted on 03/12/2014 7:26:38 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
As a Christian and a fan of Hollywood’s past biblical epics, I got excited upon viewing the first trailer for Darren Aronofsky’s Noah. The story of Noah and his ark has resonated through every culture of man, yet has never been the subject of a major Hollywood motion picture.
Alongside my enthusiasm, skepticism lurked. Modern Hollywood producing a biblical epic adhering to the written narrative and theological themes seemed unlikely given a culture increasingly opposed to the source material. That doubt grew with last month’s report that a disclaimer would be attached to the film’s marketing explaining that “artistic license has been taken.”
Any adaptation requires artistic license. Certainly, narratives were added to Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments which fleshed out the characters and layered the world in which Moses lived. Adding Anne Baxter’s Nefretiri to spice things up between Moses and Rameses is one thing. But you don’t add or subtract commandments from the ten. In the case of Noah, the disclaimer added by Paramount addressed criticism from Christian groups who claim that the film deviates substantively from the biblical narrative.
A clue to Aronofsky’s approach emerged alongside reports that actress Emma Watson had become sick during production after the director banned bottled water from their location. Watson told Wonderland magazine that the ban comported with the “pro-environmental message” of the film. The Telegraph recalled that Aronofsky called Noah “the first environmentalist” in a 2011 interview.
Now we have begun to see clips from the film. The one above revealed Aronofsky’s revised reason for Noah to build an ark. “Our family has been chosen for a great task, to save the innocent… the animals,” Noah tells his family.
When one of his sons asks what makes the animals innocent, Noah’s daughter beats him to the punch: “Because they still live as they did in the Garden [of Eden].”
From this we may infer that God regards animals as morally superior to human beings. In the clip, Noah adds, “I guess we get to start over too,” as if the involvement of his family were an afterthought secondary to God’s purpose.
The Bible tells a different story. All creation shares the curse of sin, including animals. The flood surged as judgment against that sin, and Noah’s family was preserved in fulfillment of God’s covenant to provide salvation for mankind.
By turning the story of Noah into an environmental tale, Aronofsky has missed the point. Beyond artistic license, he seems to have defiled the story’s essence. Imagine a film about the terrorist attacks of 9/11 which portrayed the hijackers as Hindu, and you understand the difference between artistic license and fraud. If Aronofsky’s Noah ends up as divergent as the above clip, it will trivialize something sacred, the treasured relationship between God and mankind.
Except for that movie in 1928 called...ummm, what was it called...ummm...Oh, yeah: NOAH'S ARK.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah%27s_Ark_(1928_film)
But what about the unicorns?
This would've been the book slapper on the set of Who Framed Roger Rabbit. They kept a couple character names, one line about a 3-year old dinky, and just about nothing else. Roger WAS the killer in the book (about comic strips, not animated cartoons).
Ping.
I’m concerned about this trend and have seen public, official robberies against relatively good families in ranching supported by false accusations of cruelty to animals (losses really caused by bad weather). Many families are also kept homeless for the same excuse. Another related story...
Oregon cat that trapped family will undergo therapy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3132371/posts
In some circles, the Seventh Law is said to be an argument for vegetarianism. This problem has visited history before. Animal “rights” philosophies and laws were evident in ancient, idolatrous empires.
And what about Abel?
That’s hysterical!!!!
We are hearing there may well not be these controversies in the movie that were prematurely ascribed to it.
I think we are all going to have to have our bibles in hand to confront these nuts on the environmental versus the disobedience of peoples issue.
Also on the issue that man was given dominion over the animals.
I agree with you.
I’ll wait to see it before I pass judgement, Hugh Hewitt, Catholic, saw it and said the hubbub on environmentalism and other controversies aren’t there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.