BZZZAP!
Posted on 02/26/2014 3:05:25 PM PST by Notary Sojac
No. christ to mohammed? Certainly.
First of all, it's Christ with a capital C. It's a show of respect for Our Redeemer and God's Only Son sent to save we sinners. And to even imply that the pedophile mohammed (lack of capitalization is intentional for that servant of satan) is in any way, shape or form equivalent to Jesus Christ is utterly absurd and not at all Conservative. My personal hope (and I'm sure others here on FR share that hope) is that you may you find God's forgiveness through sincere repentance.
Young Republican official: Tea Party is full of drooling, senile angry bullies who are ‘mad at everything’; Update: Tweets deleted
Not in America.
You know nothing about God. He asked for His sheep to be fed by their brothers, NOT government. We are to take care of one another. Our rights come from God, not government. They only take them away. Try feeding your family fish or game without a license. Government took that right away, not God. A properous man is to share his wealth with widows and orphans but not the lazy.
What in that do you disagree with?
‘bout time.
IATZ
Well, thanks, all for the engaging and challenging discussion, but I still don’t believe that atheism is compatible with conservatism.
However, I do believe it is compatible with libertarianism and objectivism. In fact, it’s de rigueur for objectivism, no?
He just didn’t get it.
Libertarianism is a matter of enforcement, not morality.
God rewarded Job with even more than he had before. Who knew God was making him “godless and morally compromised”. ;-)
It certainly is.
OK so you had/have bad parents. They did not create your soul/spirit intellect. After the first adult humans were formed by the Creator, their offspring began life at conception when that fertilized egg was given its soul/spirit intellect. There is nothing you can do to change the fact that when flesh dies that soul/spirit intellect returns to the Maker that sent it. Might as well start dealing in reality the sooner the better.
He did not. His loss.
I don’t know (and once again, I said agnostic, not athiest), but yet here I am, primarily a rabid strict-constructionist conservative and secondarily an agnostic...and my dog is named Dagny. :{)
Do you mean the attitude towards capitalism ?
Check out Kirk.
Our present day attitudes towards free enterprise and free trade are not terribly ancient. Their roots are old, but the details aren’t that old. Back in the 1890’s one could say that what we now consider the more populist Evangelical\fundamentalist\pentecostal churches were solidly against capitalism as they knew it.
Which is precisely why, contrary to some here on FR, I have never and will never consider Ayn Rand a Conservative. As an atheist, it naturally followed that Rand has no respect for life and thus was an abortionist. Oh sure, she strung together some clever words, but a Conservative Rand was not. Whatever else she may have stood for, advocating the butchering of God's innocent children is the totality of what Ayn Rand was all about.
Christians created America, and a capitalistic nation.
Of course she wasn’t conservative, in any current or historical sense. She was a radical of her own stripe.
Hey, I like the dog! Given any thought to “Zot the Magic Dragon”? ;’)
I want to know why the sudden need for recognition as a group to be pandered to. If they’re conservative they can vote conservatively without wearing a sign around their neck.
And exactly how are we supposed to “recognize” them as atheist conservatives? Do we remove God from the money or throw a few chaplains out of the military? Maybe they should sue a businessman for refusing to do business with them.
Its pure left wing behavior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.