Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sasportas
>>The setting of this “unveiling” is post-tribulational - which Paul interprets as the resurrection/rapture.<<

Cute way you lumped “resurrection/rapture” together. To those who insist on injecting meaning into a text I suppose it works. To those of us who “search the scriptures daily to see if these things be true” not so much. Paul was pretty clear in his writings that we will “at rest” with him through the tribulation and the Lord’s return to destroy the nations.

97 posted on 02/08/2014 5:57:24 AM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear

I wasn’t being “cute” or devious when I said resurrection/rapture. One immediately precedes the other. There can be no rapture of the redeemed without there first being a resurrection of the same. I thought all pretribs believed this - I was once a a very studious pretribber myself, when I believed this.

Wheresoever the resurrection is, there will the rapture be also.

If tying the rapture to the resurrection upsets you, it must upset you more to see Paul in 1 Cor. 15:54b (quoting Isa. 25:7-9, in context) tying said resurrection/rapture to the revelation (unveiling) - so often in the NT referring to the post-trib event.


100 posted on 02/08/2014 11:35:42 AM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson