No.
And I’m not going to.
It’d be nice to have an answer to my question, it’s yes or no. I’d like to understand this further.
Then how can you comment on it?
Most Protestants find it in 2 Timothy 3:16-17:
All scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
The fact is that this passage (or any other) does not even hint at Scripture being the sole rule of faith. It says that Scripture is inspired and necessary—a rule of faith—but in no way does it teach that Scripture alone is all one needs to determine the truth about faith and morals in the Church. My attempt to defend this bedrock teaching of Protestantism led me to conclude that sola scriptura is unreasonable, unbiblical, and unworkable.
No.
And I’m not going to.
It’d be nice to have an answer to my question, it’s yes or no. I’d like to understand this further.
***
Why not read what you are commenting on, how can one respond to something they have not read?