Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How many of your favorite New Testament books were popular among the early Christians?
jimmy Akin ^ | January 17, 2014 | Jimmy Akin

Posted on 01/17/2014 1:58:12 PM PST by NYer

BodmerPapyrus

Obviously, taken as a whole, the books of the New Testament were quite popular. They were Scripture, after all!

But how popular were they individually?

People today have favorite books in the Bible–ones they go to all the time, and ones they only rarely look at.

This is a phenomenon that affects both the books of the Old and the New Testament, and it’s possible to get a sense of how popular particular books were in particular time periods.

One way of doing that–before the Bible was bound as a single volume–is by seeing how many copies there are of individual books.

In Larry W. Hurtado’s outstanding study, The Earliest Christian Artifacts: Manuscripts and Christian Origins, he offer a listing of how many early (2nd-3rd century) manuscripts we have pieces of from the books of the New Testament.

This gives us an approximate idea (but only an approximate idea) of which books were more popular than others in this time period, because the Christians in these centuries had to have copies make of single books or a few books together, and the more popular they were, more copies would be made, and the more likely the manuscripts would be to survive to today.

Recently there have been rumors of a number of new early manuscripts being found, but these have not been verified as yet. If they are verified these might alter the following counts slightly, but they would not offer the overall picture much.

Here’s the count both by canonical frequency and order:

By Frequency:

By Canonical Order:

As you’d expect, the Gospels and Acts are the most popular books of all–with the exception of Mark, which was startlingly less popular (most likely because it’s short and does not contain much unique information; it’s virtually all found in Matthew and Luke; also, it’s literary style is lesser).

After the Gospels and Acts, Revelation is the next most popular (everybody wants to know about the Apocalypse!). This is interesting in part because the canonicity of Revelation was doubted by some for a time, but it’s subject matter is compelling.

After that we find Paul’s epistles, which tend to be more popular than the Catholic epistles, and the longer works tend to be more popular than the shorter ones (which you might predict since a shorter work is, by its nature, less informative than a longer one).

The fact that Hebrews has as many early manuscripts as Romans is surprising, partly because its canonicity was questioned by some. The high Christology it contains, however, might have boosted how popular it was (it also is a longer work).

James is also quite popular–moreso than the other Catholic epistles.

All of this has to be taken with some nuance, because what survived may not be fully representative of what was popular. Also, discovering even a few new manuscripts would change the rankings of some of these books.

But it’s still helpful for developing a general picture of what was popular.

And that picture significantly coincides with what most Christians today consider the most popular books.

So which of your favorites rank high–or don’t? Let me know in the comment box!



TOPICS: Catholic; History; Ministry/Outreach; Worship
KEYWORDS: bible; catholic; nt; ot; scripture

1 posted on 01/17/2014 1:58:12 PM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; ...

Your favs, ping!


2 posted on 01/17/2014 1:58:46 PM PST by NYer ("The wise man is the one who can save his soul. - St. Nimatullah Al-Hardini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Well, as a good (!) Catholic, obviously the Gospels and Acts.


3 posted on 01/17/2014 2:26:00 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
In Larry W. Hurtado’s outstanding study, The Earliest Christian Artifacts: Manuscripts and Christian Origins, he offer a listing of how many early (2nd-3rd century) manuscripts we have pieces of from the books of the New Testament. This gives us an approximate idea (but only an approximate idea) of which books were more popular than others in this time period, because the Christians in these centuries had to have copies make of single books or a few books together, and the more popular they were, more copies would be made, and the more likely the manuscripts would be to survive to today.

"This is Casey Kasem. Before we hear our next hit, we have a long-distance dedication from Paul, who lives in Tarsus. And he writes...."

4 posted on 01/17/2014 2:26:22 PM PST by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
(most likely because it’s short and does not contain much unique information; it’s virtually all found in Matthew and Luke; also, it’s literary style is lesser).

I started to go through the gospels in parallel once, using the United Bible Societies parallel edition. What I found striking about Mark was that, for what it does give us, it often gives us more detail than the other gospels.

5 posted on 01/17/2014 3:23:40 PM PST by Lee N. Field ("You keep using that verse, but I do not think it means what you think it means.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Seems like a strange question from Jimmy. Churches were probably lucky to have a single copy of the New Testament. This was true until medieval times, prior to the invention of the printing press, when a Bible was worth a year’s wages, which is why Bibles were often chained to pulpits.


6 posted on 01/17/2014 3:28:19 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

May favorite is Luke. He has several parables and accounts not included in other Gospels.


7 posted on 01/18/2014 9:25:34 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson