Posted on 01/02/2014 10:13:07 AM PST by DouglasKC
As per my email friend...no need to ping me to those threads...but thank you for thinking of me. Take care and God bless...
My ping here was simply what happens on many threads: Responders will respond to post #1...and you happen to be the instigator of this thread.
That doesn’t make the process any more reliable or explain why, if Jesus and God are one in the same, Jesus would pray to God.
That doesn’t make the process any more reliable
***The process is plenty reliable for honest historians. It is idealogues with an axe to grind who find the historicity process so unreliable. And right beside them, we find heretics.
Let me guess. You're going to be the judge of which ones are "honest".
Thanks for sticking your finger in my eye! Now I know who not to trust...
It’s a simple test. Does the historian agree that Julius Caesar said “veni vidi vici”? Does the historian agree that Jesus said “Ani Hu. And you shall see the son of man seated on the right hand of Power coming on the clouds of heaven” before the Sanhedrin and was put to death for answering the question of His identity? There are plenty of simple places in history and in the bible to see if someone’s grinding an idealogical axe.
Here’s a good place for a lurker to start.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1971569/posts
That's the basis for every fallacy of over-simplification.
It’s noticeable that certain posters are always on the side of the antichristians, the heretics, and the anticonservatives. With such an ideological axe to grind, they can’t even be honest with simple historical evidence.
Time to stop feeding the trolls.
It is a simple test. Someone with an ideological axe to grind could complicate a ham sandwich.
Time to stop feeding the trolls. Thanks for bumping the thread T4BTT
Your game is busted.
Thanks for bumping the thread T4BTT,T
Spam won’t fix it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3069049/posts?q=1&;page=2541
Of all the possible uses a man might have for the scriptures, tearing it apart and using the pieces to build traps doesn’t seem like a partucularly good one.
What did I do to you!?
We all can't be Winston Churchill!
If it LOOKS like a duck, and QUACKS like a duck, and WALKS like a duck; then it is probably safe to assume it IS a duck.
Don’t mind me; I talk to myself a lot...
Thanks!
It’s only 7:40 AM and I’m hungry for a turkey sandwich!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.