Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fairytale Fever
Harvesting the Fruit of Vatican II ^ | 10/04/13 | Louie Verrecchio

Posted on 10/04/2013 2:37:31 PM PDT by ebb tide

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last
To: verga; ebb tide
Serious question: Why are you giving more credence to liberal media opinions about papal speeches than you would to say ones on Reagan? You know that the MSM cherry picks to support their homosexual liberal agenda. I strongly urge reading the actual words not what some liberal reporter says the Pope says.

Serious answer, I wasn't talking about the "MSM" and their views of the new Pope. Just responding to the comment posted by Ebb Tide, who said:

Let me give you a little advice. Pay no attention to any Popes after Pope Pius XII. Pay no attention to the Second Vatican council. The former were/are modernists; the latter a purely pastoral council. If you can do those two things, you and even Catholics will never be confused about the true Catholic Faith.

Don’t expect me to defend one jota of VC II or any pope since Pius XII. I’m sure there are Catholics on this forum who will gladly do so, however, and that will just confuse you more.

Are you ever going to address this statement or is it more fun to attack non-Catholic Christians?

121 posted on 10/06/2013 11:33:01 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

Even when the church is wrong it is right. No matter how bad or wrong the policy, it is correct, even if it totally contradicts what they believed last year which was also correct.

Starting to sound Orwellian.


122 posted on 10/06/2013 11:34:30 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: terycarl; donmeaker
the Catholic Church is NOT infallible....sometimes she makes unusual mistakes

I'll have to bookmark this for the next time we are told the Catholic Church is infallible in matters of faith and morals. Is it too hard to decide what the deal is and stick to it???

123 posted on 10/06/2013 11:35:47 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans; metmom

Sounds like some of them need a “come to Jesus” moment!


124 posted on 10/06/2013 11:39:03 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

He ain’t Luther. He’s ALL yours!


125 posted on 10/06/2013 11:41:46 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide; terycarl; verga
The Second Vatican Council was a pastoral council. It pronounced no new dogma.

Lumen Gentium from Vatican II was part of what was called the Dogmatic Constitution of the Church. Now it's just a "pastoral council" and has NO weight on the faith and morals of the Catholic Church? I wonder what other Catholics think about that? Can you guys just take it or leave it when Popes put out a Dogmatic Constitution of the Church? Funny how "Protestants" are pilloried here for daring to reject Roman Cathlic dogma.

126 posted on 10/06/2013 11:55:03 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Yes, it does. I kinda think it's where he got the idea for 1984 in the first place!
127 posted on 10/06/2013 11:58:18 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: terycarl
I don't have time to do that right now, but it says somethibne like whatsoever you shall bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever you shall loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven......do you suppose that He would allow erroneous decisions made on Earth to be bound in Heaven????

No, which is why that verse is not properly being used when it comes to papal infallibility.

The whole context of the passage in in dealing with a person who has done wrong and church discipline, not an absolute authority given to one man to dictate to God what happens on earth and in heaven.

Matthew 18:15-20 “If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault, between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. But if he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, that every charge may be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses. If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church. And if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. Again I say to you, if two of you agree on earth about anything they ask, it will be done for them by my Father in heaven. For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them.”

The matter is church disciple, which comes into play after an attempt at reconciliation or correction at the individual, personal level. It involves more than one party and is not blanket power given to one man for establishing doctrine.

Context is everything and trying to establish the infallibility of one man by taking a verse out of context and applying it to a situation for which is is not intended is disingenuous on the part of the RCC.

It's deceit, plain and simple, to justify the power grab the early church leaders made in the name of Christ.

128 posted on 10/07/2013 12:25:36 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of faith....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: boatbums
Are you ever going to address this statement or is it more fun to attack non-Catholic Christians?

Advice is not an attack. Is it an attack when a parent tells a child to eat their vegetables so they get big and strong?

129 posted on 10/07/2013 3:00:07 AM PDT by verga (Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Starting to sound Orwellian.

Starting???


 


 
Eerily familiar...
 
 

Party ownership of the print media
made it easy to manipulate public opinion,
and the film and radio carried the process further.


 



16. Ministry Of Truth

.......

The Ministry of Truth, Winston's place of work, contained, it was said, three thousand rooms above ground level, and corresponding ramifications below.

The Ministry of Truth concerned itself with Lies. Party ownership of the print media made it easy to manipulate public opinion, and the film and radio carried the process further.

The primary job of the Ministry of Truth was to supply the citizens of Oceania with newspapers, films, textbooks, telescreen programmes, plays, novels - with every conceivable kind of information, instruction, or entertainment, from a statue to a slogan, from a lyric poem to a biological treatise, and from a child's spelling-book to a Newspeak dictionary.

Winston worked in the RECORDS DEPARTMENT (a single branch of the Ministry of Truth) editing and writing for The Times. He dictated into a machine called a speakwrite. Winston would receive articles or news-items which for one reason or another it was thought necessary to alter, or, in Newspeak, rectify. If, for example, the Ministry of Plenty forecast a surplus, and in reality the result was grossly less, Winston's job was to change previous versions so the old version would agree with the new one. This process of continuous alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound-tracks, cartoons, photographs - to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance.

When his day's work started, Winston pulled the speakwrite towards him, blew the dust from its mouthpiece, and put on his spectacles. He dialed 'back numbers' on the telescreen and called for the appropriate issues of The Times, which slid out of the pneumatic tube after only a few minutes' delay. The messages he had received referred to articles or news-items which for one reason or another it was thought necessary to rectify.

In the walls of the cubicle there were three orifices. To the right of the speakwrite, a small pneumatic tube for written messages; to the left, a larger one for newspapers; and on the side wall, within easy reach of Winston's arm, a large oblong slit protected by a wire grating. This last was for the disposal of waste paper. Similar slits existed in thousands or tens of thousands throughout the building, not only in every room but at short intervals in every corridor. For some reason they were nicknamed memory holes. When one knew that any document was due for destruction, or even when one saw a scrap of waste paper lying about, it was an automatic action to lift the flap of the nearest memory hole and drop it in, whereupon it would be whirled away on a current of warm air to the enormous furnaces which were hidden somewhere in the recesses of the building.

As soon as Winston had dealt with each of the messages, he clipped his speakwritten corrections to the appropriate copy of The Times and pushed them into the pneumatic tube. Then, with a movement which was as nearly as possible unconscious, he crumpled up the original message and any notes that he himself had made, and dropped them into the memory hole to be devoured by the flames.

What happened in the unseen labyrinth to which the tubes led, he did not know in detail, but he did know in general terms. As soon as all the corrections which happened to be necessary in any particular number of The Times had been assembled and collated, that number would be reprinted, the original copy destroyed, and the corrected copy placed on the files in its stead.

In the cubicle next to him the little woman with sandy hair toiled day in day out, simply at tracking down and deleting from the Press the names of people who had been vaporized and were therefore considered never to have existed. And this hall, with its fifty workers or thereabouts, was only one-sub-section, a single cell, as it were, in the huge complexity of the Records Department. Beyond, above, below, were other swarms of workers engaged in an unimaginable multitude of jobs.

There were huge printing-shops and their sub editors, their typography experts, and their elaborately equipped studios for the faking of photographs. There was the tele-programmes section with its engineers, its producers and its teams of actors specially chosen for their skill in imitating voices; clerks whose job was simply to draw up lists of books and periodicals which were due for recall; vast repositories where the corrected documents were stored; and the hidden furnaces where the original copies were destroyed.

And somewhere or other, quite anonymous, there were the directing brains who co-ordinated the whole effort and laid down the lines of policy which made it necessary that this fragment of the past should be preserved, that one falsified, and the other rubbed out of existence.

 
 


130 posted on 10/07/2013 5:12:43 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

!


131 posted on 10/07/2013 6:11:44 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income & tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

You’re the one attacking Catholics. I’m just defending my religion.


132 posted on 10/07/2013 6:25:05 AM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy


133 posted on 10/07/2013 6:48:16 AM PDT by BlueDragon (keep looking. there just has to be a special pleading around here which will explain everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: verga
Is it an attack when a parent tells a child to eat their vegetables so they get big and strong?

Is it an attack when the Church is told that material that got William Tyndale KILLED is being linked to??


http://wesley.nnu.edu/sermons-essays-books/william-tyndales-translation/

134 posted on 10/07/2013 7:45:45 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
 
Get Fuzzy

135 posted on 10/07/2013 10:33:15 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: metmom; terycarl
>> The matter is church disciple, which comes into play after an attempt at reconciliation or correction at the individual, personal level. It involves more than one party and is not blanket power given to one man for establishing doctrine.<<

And in addition to that we have a couple of other considerations in regards to that statement. It also says “For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them.”

Also consider that Peter himself tells us this: ”And God, who knows the heart, bore witness by granting them the holy Spirit just as he did us. 9 He made no distinction between us and them, for by faith he purified their hearts” as recorded in Acts 15:8-9.

136 posted on 10/07/2013 10:49:37 AM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
You’re the one attacking Catholics. I’m just defending my religion.

Attacking Catholicism. Big difference. You're the ones attacking anyone BUT Roman Catholics. I'm defending my faith as taught in Holy Scripture against those who insist that their religion can contradict Scripture.

137 posted on 10/07/2013 11:08:57 AM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

So the pope, seeing Vatican II, has decided not to object to it.

Is his silence also infallable?


138 posted on 10/07/2013 11:31:24 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: verga
Advice is not an attack. Is it an attack when a parent tells a child to eat their vegetables so they get big and strong?

I see, so, in RC world everything y'all say is "advice" and everything the Non-Caths say is "attacks"? That's what you are saying? What a strange, convoluted world that is!

Tell me, when posters here say things like "Vatican II is just a pastoral council" and not binding upon all Catholics, who gets to decide that it should be ignored? How are Catholics, who have a take it or leave it attitude on things that come out of a "Dogmatic Constitution of the Church", any different that the Non-Catholic Christians here that are condemned if they determine to believe only those doctrines that can be proved by Holy Scripture? It hasn't escaped my notice that the one who posted this thread is getting little criticism from fellow Catholics. Why is that?

139 posted on 10/07/2013 11:35:01 AM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

I would say no pope has ever spoken infallibly at any time.

Since a Pope decided he was infallible, and was in error to do so, no Pope is ever infallible.


140 posted on 10/07/2013 11:39:35 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson