[boatbums]

Serious question: Why are you giving more credence to liberal media opinions about papal speeches than you would to say ones on Reagan? You know that the MSM cherry picks to support their homosexual liberal agenda. I strongly urge reading the actual words not what some liberal reporter says the Pope says.

Serious answer, I wasn't talking about the "MSM" and their views of the new Pope. Just responding to the comment posted by Ebb Tide, who said:

Let me give you a little advice. Pay no attention to any Popes after Pope Pius XII. Pay no attention to the Second Vatican council. The former were/are modernists; the latter a purely pastoral council. If you can do those two things, you and even Catholics will never be confused about the true Catholic Faith.

Don’t expect me to defend one jota of VC II or any pope since Pius XII. I’m sure there are Catholics on this forum who will gladly do so, however, and that will just confuse you more.

Are you ever going to address this statement or is it more fun to attack non-Catholic Christians?

[verga]

Are you ever going to address this statement or is it more fun to attack non-Catholic Christians?

Advice is not an attack. Is it an attack when a parent tells a child to eat their vegetables so they get big and strong?

[ebb tide]

You’re the one attacking Catholics. I’m just defending my religion.